I’m an English teacher. Let's just say, math isn't my thing.
In this school-wide initiative, we all did the same reading passage or math problem every day. These were sometimes not available until five minutes before the class and rushed out to teachers.
On this day, we had this math problem that dealt with the volume of a cube ( or something like that), and we had to figure that out to resolve the larger problem. But the image provided was two-dimensional. It was a letter T, a box that was completely laid flat.
With a very clear, personal awareness of my non-math aptitude, I was actually a better model for learners that day. First, I had to offer myself some motivation for doing the problem other than it was required because doing something that way isn’t a motivation. I had to be curious about how to solve the problem.
Teachers were given the answers, of course. But
what good is an answer without wanting to understand where it comes from?
My mind just wasn't getting it, though. It didn't bother anyone, least of all me, that I didn't have the answer because we often held discussions where I didn't have the answer. That was okay in my class.
So, we piddled and pondered together, and after a few minutes, a student figured it out (math whiz that he was!) jumped up excitedly and tried to tell me what to do. I didn't follow, so he ran up to the front, grabbed some scissors, cut the paper,
and made the cube by folding it over.
This learning moment exemplifies my philosophy of education.
Now, I know a lot of people talk about strategies and methods when they discuss their philosophy of education, but I have to wonder what it is that induces those principles--what's behind the decision-making process that compels one to choose a particular strategy or method? Doesn’t our mindset come first?
Because there was no method or strategy that I used in our cube story. But we learned.
There were however, several mindsets at work, and I think my philosophy of education seems boils down to mindsets. If the mindset is appropriate, the method or strategy will emerge more naturally. They are (in no particular order): mindfulness, curiosity, creativity, and humility.
Mindfulness has to do with a state of
being in response to or approach to things as a teacher (or a
learner). Whether that is a stellar discussion post from an adult learner
or a snarky comment from a teenager face-to-face, I steer away from knee-jerk
reactions. Rather, I prefer to take a moment and consider what is actually happening
or will happen. I allow the moment to happen--it's being fully present.
In the cube story, I allowed the moment to
happen. Without that mindfulness, I probably would have just glossed over to
the answer. If I attach mindfulness to
an action, I would call it allowing. I enjoyed allowing the moment of
not knowing, thinking, collaborating, and listening.
Curiosity as a mindset played a large role, here--the ability to be curious about things that we might not be interested in or that we might already know a lot about is a game-changer for education. It is a mindset that has helped me in so many ways with students. For example, I taught Frankenstein every year in AP Lang. While I can certainly say I knew the story and characters inside and out, every year, I would approach the novel with new curiosity. I created a question for myself to answer, generally along the lines of "How is this ages-old novel STILL relevant today?" And every year, without fail, I'd come up with an answer.
Curiosity seems to attach to the action of searching. Students need to see us searching.
Creativity has recently gotten a lot of press, but I'm careful when I say that this mindset is one of the driving forces of my philosophy. I'm not a creative genius or anything, but I know it when I feel it, and I notice when it's not there.
Curiosity as a mindset played a large role, here--the ability to be curious about things that we might not be interested in or that we might already know a lot about is a game-changer for education. It is a mindset that has helped me in so many ways with students. For example, I taught Frankenstein every year in AP Lang. While I can certainly say I knew the story and characters inside and out, every year, I would approach the novel with new curiosity. I created a question for myself to answer, generally along the lines of "How is this ages-old novel STILL relevant today?" And every year, without fail, I'd come up with an answer.
Curiosity seems to attach to the action of searching. Students need to see us searching.
Creativity has recently gotten a lot of press, but I'm careful when I say that this mindset is one of the driving forces of my philosophy. I'm not a creative genius or anything, but I know it when I feel it, and I notice when it's not there.
I don't see it as a "what," though.
It's a how. It's a process. It's a blend of willingness and flexibility and
exciting discomfort. I want that in learners because that's where they can make
some strides as far as autonomy (which they'll need) and in problem-solving.
The art of brainstorming, collaboration, and sharing all fall under this category, and it seems to be one of the areas where my former students excelled. Though our cube story focused on one person as a catalyst, it was still a collaborative moment. Perhaps creativity can be connected to the action of trusting. Without trusting each other, could we have had this moment?
The art of brainstorming, collaboration, and sharing all fall under this category, and it seems to be one of the areas where my former students excelled. Though our cube story focused on one person as a catalyst, it was still a collaborative moment. Perhaps creativity can be connected to the action of trusting. Without trusting each other, could we have had this moment?
The last mindset in my philosophy, Humility,
was really evident, here, and it certainly played a role in moving the students
forward in comprehension. They saw me struggle and succeed. They struggled and
succeeded, and we had a positive learning moment. Humility, as an action, could
be seen as acknowledging one’s self. I am more open and flexible in my awareness of what I don’t know.
Side note: I had to laugh, recently, because
one of the comments I received on my recent course evaluations (I facilitate
professional development courses for educators) was: "I know more on some
topics than the facilitator does."
I thought--"Damn right, you do! I learned from you! I want to learn from you! That's what it's all about!" Though I'm sure she meant it as a negative, it was actually a sort of positive for me, if only because she saw me as fellow-learner, which was my goal anyway.
I thought--"Damn right, you do! I learned from you! I want to learn from you! That's what it's all about!" Though I'm sure she meant it as a negative, it was actually a sort of positive for me, if only because she saw me as fellow-learner, which was my goal anyway.
After the student had shown the class what the
heck was going on with cube, you could hear the collective,
"AHHHHHH..." followed by the scribbling of the problem resolution.
We applauded him and ourselves that day. We
shared in that moment of curious searching, mindful allowing, creative trusting,
and humble acknowledging of ourselves and each other as a community of learners.
Buy our book! In it, Mindy and some of her former students outline best practices for developing a positive learning environment.
Transparent Teaching of Adolescents: Creating the Ideal Class for Students and Teachers
Great, helpful post! I need to brainstorm words that I believe to be a part of my teaching philosophy to help narrow it all down. Thanks for the inspiration!
ReplyDeleteMy mindset was to figure out google docs a little more and how to post things to my blog easier and the time came I think I am one step closer today since it only took me a couple of hours to get to my final step. Trust me in the past I have spend many hours, and I feel I am pretty technology savvy until I start doing this part. :)
ReplyDelete